{
  "title": "The Selection Loop — Lifted field experiments",
  "version": 2,
  "protocol": "For every run, record scope, prompt and candidate pool, selection method, time accounting, disposition definitions, human acceptance criterion, and follow-up. Keep measurement definitions stable where possible; use the original 15-action/75-minute design only when performing a matched replication.",
  "note": "Public derived observation. The private Lifted analytical ledger remains canonical. Unmeasured fields retain null values.",
  "sessions": [
    {
      "id": "testing-001",
      "observed_date": "2026-10-18",
      "venture": "EDRP",
      "origin": "Commercial Intelligence + Compressed Action Library",
      "original_target_max_actions": 100,
      "library_actions_generated": 70,
      "top_actions_selected": 15,
      "actions_reviewed": 15,
      "reported_human_review_minutes": 75,
      "promoted_to_weekly_workflow": 2,
      "not_promoted": 13,
      "explicitly_rejected": null,
      "deferred": null,
      "closed_after_learning": null,
      "action_level_ids_and_dispositions_verified": false,
      "survivor_ids": null,
      "downstream_results_verified": false,
      "subsequent_human_attention_minutes": null,
      "source_quality": "participant self-report plus conversation-derived prompt count; per-action classifications await independent recovery",
      "observed_friction": [
        "AI analysis disproportionate to immediate decisions",
        "premature classification and operating systems",
        "human filtering and unrecoverable cross-thread rejection tally"
      ],
      "future_intervention_hypothesis": "Stronger upstream filtering for operational proportionality lowers human adjudication burden while preserving learning from productive rejections.",
      "notes": "Five minutes per reviewed action and 37.5 minutes per promoted thread are derived means; the latter measures selection cost; execution cost is tracked separately.",
      "run_label": "Run 001 — 15 in 75"
    },
    {
      "id": "testing-002",
      "observed_date": "2026-10-18",
      "venture": "10-venture website portfolio",
      "origin": "Scoped compressed website-refinement action screening",
      "actions_presented": 20,
      "actions_classified": 20,
      "reported_human_review_minutes_approx": 3,
      "timing_precision": "participant approximation; no independent stopwatch or per-action timing",
      "selected_for_immediate_execution": 7,
      "deferred": 3,
      "explicitly_rejected": 10,
      "immediately_selected_rate": 0.35,
      "deferred_rate": 0.15,
      "rejected_rate": 0.5,
      "derived_classifications_per_minute_approx": 6.67,
      "derived_minutes_per_immediately_selected_action_approx": 0.43,
      "action_level_ids_and_dispositions_verified": false,
      "implementation_results_verified": false,
      "subsequent_human_attention_minutes": null,
      "downstream_survival_count": null,
      "prospective_success_criterion": "participant's judgment of expected usefulness per human minute, informed by contextual mental simulation",
      "criterion_assessment": "participant reported all seven immediately selected actions had already passed the prospective gate",
      "realized_usefulness_measure": null,
      "source_quality": "participant-reported aggregate counts and approximate time; contemporaneous private Lifted cycle; previously approved public Field Note 147",
      "public_source_entry": "/#entry-147",
      "observed_interpretation": "Participant attributed lower screening friction in part to a more narrowly scoped generating prompt; not a controlled causal comparison.",
      "notes": "The seven selections are positive judgments under the participant's declared gate, not independently verified completed products. The 15-in-75 session uses a different promotion stage.",
      "run_label": "Run 002 — 20 in 3"
    }
  ],
  "comparison_note": "Session 001 promotes actions to a weekly workflow after extended investigation; Session 002 immediately classifies scoped website refinements. Ratios describe observations under different conditions, not causal effects or identical positive outcomes.",
  "comparison_derived": {
    "nominal_throughput_ratio_approx": 33.33,
    "baseline_actions_per_minute": 0.2,
    "rapid_actions_per_minute_approx": 6.67,
    "baseline_minutes_per_promoted_thread": 37.5,
    "rapid_minutes_per_accepted_action_approx": 0.43,
    "comparability": "Different scope, candidate formulation, venture distribution, review modality and positive-decision gates. Treat rates as descriptions, not effects."
  },
  "experiment_id": "selection-loop",
  "description": "A longitudinal study of how candidate scope, human attention and judgment affect selection and downstream action survival. Historical run names describe conditions rather than constrain future tests."
}